Case Reviews

Same incidents, different lens: each report is read as evidence of cognitive/environmental effects before speculative infrastructure claims.

Review standard: sequence clarity, baseline quality, confounder capture, and alternative hypotheses.

How Reviews Work

We preserve the original narrative summary while applying a counter-theory rubric: What is most likely? What is testable next? What did the observer miss in baseline logging?

Severity (Counter Version)

Low: anomaly explained by common attention or memory effects.
Medium: repeated pattern with incomplete controls.
High: persistent multi-observer anomaly after reasonable controls.

Loading case index…